Upcoming events! Poetry at Somerset House, stories at Quiltbag Cabaret

Hello readers!

If you’re wondering where I’ve been – things have been a bit intense lately, and other writing took priority over blogging. I’ll be back soon. In the meantime, here are two events where you can find my work!

Tomorrow, at Somerset House, my poetry will be part of an installation at the Museum of Water’s Midsummer Water Day event. The installation is called the Old Water Hoard, and consists of recordings of Old English poetry, texts, and isolated words and phrases on the theme of water and weather. I was invited to contribute to the Old Water Hoard after impressing an organiser with my Old English and modern English audio piece, The Book Remembers, at the Verse Kraken #2 launch a while ago. I rose to the challenge and put together a new piece called Water Became Bone – a meditation on language, culture and self, layering Anglo-Saxon poetry with modern English translations, original poetry, and an extract from a paper. The Old Water Hoard will be at various “listening stations” throughout the Museum – a sort of literary treasure hunt. 

In the further off future, I’ll be headlining the next Quiltbag Cabaret in Oxford on Friday 11th July. This time, rather than poetry, I’ll be storytelling – so if you’re a fan of feminist fairytales, socialist parables, or you just really like mermaids and monsters, this might be for you.

That’s all for now – but stay tuned for more blogging again soon…

Quick note: on creativity and “creative people”

This morning, in my travels through social media, I stumbled into a discussion about creativity and what it means to be an artist. Much of it rang true: that it’s increasingly difficult to make a living purely from your art; that success or failure in your chosen art form is tied in to a deeply personal sense of self and self-worth; that creating can feel as though it is essential to your life. Yup.

However, there was also a note to some of the comments that made me feel very uncomfortable – the idea that being an artist is something mysterious and ineffable and special, that “the average office-worker” just can’t comprehend. Underlying this sort of attitude is a number of assumptions, all of which are (in my view) utterly busted:

– That nobody who works in an office could have a deep, personal, important connection with their work. (I’ve had an office job which involved doing outreach for the transgender community, something I’d already been doing for free as an activist; another friend of mine currently has an amazing office job recovering and recording the lives of people who lived through WW1 and she is working on making public erased histories of women and people of colour; yet another works on improving services for survivors of abuse and violence… working in an office environment does not equate to doing a job which is meaningless or dull – and even if it did, you are more than your job – see next point!)

– That “office worker” and “artist” are mutually-exclusive categories. (Does my bill-paying day job stop me from being an artist? Does it unpublish my poetry, undo my performances, cancel out the hours I dedicate to my writing?)

– That there are Creative People, and Non-Creative People, existing in two separate and essentialised categories.

This last one is a real sticking-point for me.  I do not think this is a useful division to put up. I think that there are some people who have found a medium (or several) that works for them, and it’s a medium that is generally recognised as Art by the society in which they live, and they have either been encouraged in it or fell in love with it enough to work on it without encouragement, and they’re public about their relationship with it. And then there are people who don’t meet all these criteria – but that doesn’t mean they’re not creative.

I firmly believe that all people have the potential to be creative. And I say this not just as a point of ideology, but from the perspective of someone who once spent a significant amount of their spare time running art classes for little kids. There were kids who didn’t want to talk much, or who zoomed around the classroom and wouldn’t sit down, or who tried to pick arguments with their peers and teachers: but all of them, at the end of the day, made something and had fun doing so. From my experience,  I think it’s the case that little kids are much less self-conscious about making art than older people: it’s only once they get older, and some of them have been encouraged and some have been shut down, that you start to see people who are put into the category of “not creative”, whether that’s because they’ve been told they’re not talented enough to succeed and so they stop trying, or because their creativity is expressed in a medium that isn’t seen as “proper art”.

But creativity is (and should be) for EVERYONE. And some people come to it early, and some late, and some not at all – but I just do not believe that there are people who have absolutely no creative spark in them, somewhere.

Edited to add: while it’s about maths rather than the arts, this article about children being praised for “gifts” vs “skills” feels very relevant, in terms of the discourse of innate ability and there being people who “have it” or don’t.

Also, when I finished writing this entry, I didn’t really have a pithy final sentence with which to make a final flourish, but I think this Twitter conversation with Goldfish has provided it:

@goldfish: “On Creativity & Creative People”  @hel_gurney is spot-on about there being nothing magical about artists
@hel_gurney: .@goldfish Or perhaps, that art is a kind of magic that anyone can do 🙂 Thank you lots for your tweet and comment!
@goldfish: Yes – that’s a much better way of putting it!

So there we go: art is a kind of magic that anyone can do. Go forth, and find new spells to learn and love.

Pauline Baynes at Farnham Maltings: hidden histories and childhood wonder

Baynes_Tumnus

Pauline Baynes’ illustration of Mr Tumnus in his Narnian home. Image via Pinterest.

Like quite a lot of people I know, I grew up with the stories of Middle Earth and Narnia. One of the earliest ‘proper’ books I remember reading was The Hobbit, a grey and battered paperback that had belonged to my dad when he was young. While I’m aware that there is much to critique in both these fantasy worlds – and indeed, I was already blisteringly angry with Lewis’ moralism by the time I finished the series – they were two of my earliest gateways to the wider world of speculative and fantastical fiction. And in the background to these early discoveries, unobtrusive but intrinsic (like the best of movie soundtracks), were the illustrations of Pauline Baynes.

The other week, I visited the Pauline Baynes exhibition (‘An Artist’s Imagination‘) at Farnham Maltings. I wasn’t expecting to love it quite as much as I did – but it was revelatory, seeing so much of her work in one place and realising how tightly woven it had been into the fabric of my childhood imagination. Aside from the fresh and charming illustrations she provided for Tolkien and Lewis, Baynes was best-known for her intricate medieval-style paintings, so it was quite a surprise to realise that she was also behind the more ‘realistic’ cover of Watership Down – another early favourite book.

Baynes_WD

The edition of Watership Down I grew up with. Image via Pinterest.

The Baynes exhibition places familiar images beside previously-uncovered gems and snippets of hidden history. I was particularly interested by the details about her life, and  relationship with her sister Angela, a strong stylistic influence who had mentored Pauline in learning to draw and paint and attended the Farnham School of Art five years before her, but who stepped out of the limelight as Pauline began to get more commissions. The exhibition described Angela as doting on and encouraging Pauline – I found myself wondering if Angela ever resented Pauline’s later fame, or if they stayed close until the end. If anyone ever decides to write and research a book about this, I’ll definitely be reading… I was rather surprised to learn was that Pauline hadn’t actually read The Lord of the Rings before creating her famous illustrations for the front and back covers – but her sister did read it,  and painted her a massive oil painting with images of the landscape and characters as she imagined them, which Pauline then used as a source! According to my dad (the family’s resident aspiring Tolkien academic), this isn’t mentioned in any accounts of Baynes’ work with Tolkien: so this exhibition might be the first time this painting has ever been publicly displayed!

Bayne’s illustrations from Middle Earth and Narnia – the most obvious and expected parts of this exhibition – still managed to surprise. Perhaps it’s just my naïveté about how printing worked before the digital age, but I was truly impressed to realise that Baynes’ Narnia illustrations from inside the books were actually that small, rather than drawn bigger and scaled down: seeing the tiny pen-and-ink originals raised them in my estimation from ‘good’ to ‘astounding’, a level of skill in miniature that recalled the art on Russian lacquered boxes. The most compelling of her fantasy illustrations was one for which a source wasn’t given – an image of a girl watching over the edge of a ship as merfolk with long red hair rode seahorses below. The intricacy and delicacy of the brush-strokes was amazing: I spent quite a long time standing in front of it, drawn into the picture’s hypnotic world. I guessed that it was probably a plate illustration from a later edition of The Voyage of Dawn Treader (or something else related to Narnia), and having checked online, it is indeed a scene from Dawn Treader made for Brian Sibley’s The Land of Narnia. (Sibley’s blog has a digital version of this picture, but it’s so much better in person – greater range of colour across blues  and whites, and more visible detail!)

The front page of Baynes' cover for the Dictionary of Chivalry. Image via paulinebaynes.com

The front page of Baynes’ cover for the Dictionary of Chivalry. Image via paulinebaynes.com

I hadn’t encountered very much of Baynes’ medieval-style work before, and I was very taken with it. My absolute favourite of these was the giant picture of 149 traditional English proverbs (with answer key) – illustrated with a large cast of characters that defy modern ideas of perspective and proportion, it’s a bright and compelling image that skilfully references a much older artistic tradition while also containing hints of modern insouciance (check the king’s scandalised expression at the cat staring at him!). There is an online version of this available at the Mary Evans picture library – I’m considering getting a print of it for my room as a constant source of brain-teasing… There was also the rather more surreal dustjacket illustration to Grant Uden’s A Dictionary of Chivalry, which sees heraldic crests and human/animal figures overlaid with vivid brushstrokes onto a black background, like brightly-coloured ghosts.

Some more unexpected items included a silk embroidered waistcoat which Baynes used to display in her house (claiming it was formerly owned by the Prince Regent), Baynes’ final piece from the Slade School of Art (large, intricate, and definitely showing early elements of her medieval style), a large and arresting picture of Judgment Day (with demonic figures which recall the more macabre medieval woodcuts) and a newspaper double-page spread about the camouflage department in Farnham Castle where both sisters used to work (a very entertaining article in itself, with gems like “there still exists a stereotype that camouflage experts are dreamy-eyed artists who spend their time painting a tank to look like a soda fountain”, before assuring us that they are in fact very masculine soldiers indeed. Hee.) There was also an entire wall dedicated to Baynes’ illustrations for the unpublished Osric the Extraordinary Owl, written by Brian Sibley. All the birds’ feathers looked so soft I wanted to reach into the pictures and cuddle them! From what I can glean from the characterful and beautifully-textured illustrations, Osric visits doves, pheasants, peacocks and parrots and collects feathers from all of them – possibly with the aim of wearing them all? As someone who is determinedly never too old for children’s books, I very much hope it gets released eventually – it looks adorable.

Of all this cornucopia of beautiful pictures, only two were available to buy as postcards – both examples of Baynes’ commercial work and presumably linked to the exhibitions original remit as Farnham Maltings’ Christmas exhibition, they’re festive plates done for Tatler magazine and Huntley and Palmer’s biscuit company. I was interested to see how very Narnian they looked – the Huntley and Palmer advert has a procession of blue-turbanned women bringing boxes of biscuits down from a tall ice castle to load onto the sleigh of a jovial Santa evokes a mixture of Baynes’ Narnia illustrations, while the Tatler magazine’s icicle-covered winged-horse-drawn sleigh (with a dark-haired woman and young child seated together under a fur) felt very much like an image of a gentler White Witch and Edmund.

Baynes_Dawn

The full-colour front cover of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. Image via Pinterest.

For a small (and as far as I can tell, rather unsung) exhibition, it’s – in my opinion – an incredibly interesting collection and definitely of value to anyone with an interest in Baynes, Tolkien, Lewis, or illustration more generally. Many of the pieces are on loan from private collections, and the Baynes estate (like the Tolkien estate) is known for being quite strict about copyright. It’s anybody’s guess as to when these will all be available in the same place again.

Because of the exhibition’s popularity, it has been extended to the 9th of February: I wholeheartedly recommend going along if you have relevant interests and it’s within easy access for you. Farnham itself is a charming Georgian town – with a castle! – and had it not been raining on the day I visited, I would have happily spent the afternoon there. Or if you can’t make it, then here are some places you can find Baynes illustrations online: the Pauline Baynes tribute website, Lora Bounds’ Pinterest board, Brian Sibley’s blog, and the Mary Evans picture library.

(P.S. If anyone’s interested, I’ve also recently written – in a very different register! – about children’s fantasy I grew up with at cinema/TV blog Squarise.)